Unlearning Patriarchy: A Framework for Liberatory Education

1Licence notice

2Preface: How to Use This Book

You might be holding this book for different reasons. Perhaps you’re a teacher who witnessed a disturbing moment in your classroom and realized you needed better tools. Perhaps you’re a parent trying to understand the systems shaping your children’s lives. Perhaps you’re a student seeking language for experiences you’ve lived but couldn’t name. Perhaps you’re an organizer looking for frameworks to connect gender justice to your broader work.

Whoever you are, welcome. This book is for you.

But I need to be honest with you from the start: this book will challenge you. It will ask you to examine beliefs you may have held your whole life. It will require you to sit with discomfort. It will demand genuine self-criticism, not performative guilt. And it will ask you to do something — not just understand patriarchy, but actively work to dismantle it.

If you’re ready for that work, let’s begin.

2.1What This Book Is (And Isn’t)

This is a framework for understanding patriarchy as a concrete, material system — not abstract theory, but tangible analysis of how power operates in families, schools, workplaces, and culture. It’s a practical toolkit for teachers challenging patriarchy in their classrooms. The analysis is grounded in intersectional, anarchist feminist thought, connecting struggles against patriarchy to broader fights for liberation.

This is not a neutral, “objective” academic text (no such thing exists). It’s not a guide to making patriarchy kinder or more inclusive, not a celebration of individual women succeeding in oppressive systems, and not a complete or final analysis — this work is ongoing. Most importantly, it’s not a substitute for listening to those most harmed by patriarchy.

This book is also not a deep dive into patriarchy and feminist theory. See it instead as an introduction with various exploratory parts.

2.2Who I Am and Why It Matters

Before we go further, you deserve to know who’s writing this and what limitations that brings.

My gender presentation is that of a white male, and I am a teacher writing about patriarchy. I benefit from patriarchy in countless ways, even as I work to dismantle it. I have access to spaces, credibility, and safety that many others don’t. My perceived maleness means I’m taken seriously when I critique masculinity in ways that women often aren’t. My whiteness means I can write about systemic oppression without being dismissed as “biased” or “angry”. And because my gender presentation aligns with dominant expectations, I do not face the levels of scrutiny, exclusion, or violence that for example many trans people navigate in their daily lives. Recognizing these privileges does not negate the value of my work, but it does shape how I understand my responsibilities within it.

I write from a Western European context — specifically Sweden — though much of my analysis draws on anglophone feminist and critical pedagogy scholarship. This creates some tension: I’m teaching in a Swedish school system with strong unions, universal healthcare, and generous parental leave, yet drawing heavily on US-based scholarship and examples. When I describe school structures, policies, or organizing strategies, I often default to what I know from research (US/UK) or experience (Sweden). Adapt these frameworks to your local context — the principles of challenging patriarchy translate across systems even when specific tactics don’t. This shapes both what I see and what I miss. The examples I use, the systems I analyze most deeply, the movements I reference — these reflect my geographic and cultural location. While I’ve worked to include global perspectives and international examples throughout this book, my primary lens remains Western. I acknowledge this limitation and encourage readers to adapt this framework to your own contexts, drawing on local knowledge and movements.

I’m also autistic, which shapes how I experience and analyze the world. I’ve been told I lack empathy when I’m actually drowning in others’ emotions. I’ve been read as “robotic” when I’m carefully regulating intense internal experience. This gives me particular insight into how ableist assumptions intersect with patriarchal ones — and particular responsibility not to weaponize frameworks meant for liberation against neurodivergent people.

All of this means: I don’t have the lived experience of being targeted by patriarchy in the ways that women, trans people, and especially multiply marginalized people do. I can empathize. I can study. I can listen. But I cannot know what I have not lived.

So why am I writing this book? Because I have a responsibility to use my privilege to challenge the systems that grant it. Because boys and men need to hear from other men that patriarchy is destroying us too. Because I can say things in spaces where others would be dismissed or punished. Because this is my work to do.

But here’s what’s crucial: If you find something in this book that reproduces harm, erases experience, or misses the mark — please tell me. This will be published on my website with contact information. I’m committed to ongoing learning and revision. Your feedback, especially if you hold identities I don’t, is essential.

2.3A Note on Language

Throughout this book, I make specific language choices: When I write “Black people” or “Indigenous people”, I’m referring to people who have been racialized — sorted into categories of differential treatment based on constructed categories of race. When I write about “disabled students”, I’m using the social model of disability: people are disabled by social structures that assume one “normal” way of being, not by their bodies or minds. I use “cisgender” to describe people whose gender identity aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth, and “transgender” or “trans” for those whose identity differs from their assigned sex.

Patriarchy, which I define extensively in chapter 1, is a system of social organization based on male dominance and rigid gender hierarchies — not individual men being mean to women, but a structure that predates any of us and will outlast us unless we actively dismantle it.

Radical, from the Latin radix meaning “root”, refers to getting to the root cause of things — examining and addressing fundamental structures rather than surface symptoms. Radical education asks not “how do we get more students to comply?” but “why does this system require compliance in the first place?”

Liberatory education, drawing on Paulo Freire and other critical pedagogues, is teaching that aims to free both students and teachers from oppression. It’s not neutral transmission of knowledge — it’s consciously political work toward collective liberation.

2.4How to Read This Book

You don’t have to read linearly. If you’re a teacher new to this work, start with chapters one through four for foundational understanding, focus on chapters five through eight for practical tools, then return to later parts when you’re ready to organize your school and classroom. If you’re an experienced equity educator, you likely know the first parts — deep dive into Anark’s framework in chapter 5, and mine later parts for strategies. If you’re a parent, student, or community organizer, read what serves your needs — the book is designed so each part can stand alone while building toward a comprehensive framework.

The book can be used in different ways depending on your context and politics. Liberal approaches focus on equal access and representation within existing systems — challenging stereotypes, reforming policies, incremental change. This work is valuable. If your context doesn’t allow radical critique, start here. Radical approaches ask deeper questions: What if the systems themselves are the problem? How do we transform structures, not just access them? These aren’t mutually exclusive. You can work for reform while building toward revolution, celebrate individual achievements while critiquing systems, use liberal language strategically while holding radical analysis.

2.5What “Unlearning” Means

The title of this book is deliberate: not “learning about patriarchy” but unlearning it.

We’ve all already learned patriarchy. From birth, we’ve been taught rigid gender roles, hierarchical power relations, whose voices matter, whose bodies are controlled, what counts as natural. This learning happened through thousands of small moments — how adults responded to our tears, what toys we were given, whose stories we heard, what we were punished for, who we were told we could become.

By the time you’re reading this book, patriarchy is already internalized. It’s in your automatic assumptions, your reflexive reactions, your sense of what’s normal.

You can’t just add new information on top of this. You have to actively unlearn what you’ve been taught — examine assumptions you didn’t know you had, notice patterns you’ve been trained not to see, change behaviors that feel natural because they’ve been practiced your whole life. This is harder than learning something new. It requires genuine self-criticism (not guilt or shame), willingness to be wrong, tolerance for discomfort, ongoing practice, and humility about how much you still don’t see.

2.6Content Warnings and Self-Care

This book discusses sexual violence and rape culture, intimate partner violence and femicide, child abuse and trauma, systemic oppression and discrimination, suicide and mental health crises, and violence against marginalized communities. Specific content warnings appear at the beginning of chapters with particularly heavy content. Please take these seriously.

You’re allowed to take breaks, skip sections if necessary for your wellbeing, seek support, disagree with my analysis, and engage at your own pace. Self-care is not selfish — you cannot do this work from a place of depletion. Taking care of yourself is part of sustaining the long-term struggle for liberation.

If you’re experiencing crisis or need support, search online for crisis hotlines and support services in your country or city. International resources include Befrienders Worldwide (global suicide prevention, https://www.befrienders.org), International Association for Suicide Prevention (crisis centers by country, https://www.iasp.info), and UN Women (violence against women resources, https://www.unwomen.org). Local hospitals, university counseling centers, community organizations, and school counselors can also connect you with support.

2.7A Note on Discomfort

If you’re feeling uncomfortable already — good. That discomfort is information. It’s telling you that something you believe is being challenged. That’s the point.

Don’t dismiss the discomfort. Sit with it. Ask yourself: What specifically am I uncomfortable with? Why does this challenge me? What am I protecting by rejecting this? What would it mean if this were true? What would I have to change?

The most common defensive reactions are claiming this doesn’t apply to you, dismissing it as too extreme or biased, insisting you already do good work, feeling attacked, or deflecting to other groups’ problems. If you’re having these reactions, that’s normal. We all do. The question is: will you examine them, or will you use them to avoid the work?

I’m asking you to stay. Stay with the discomfort. Keep reading. Keep questioning. Keep examining. The work requires it.

2.8An Invitation

This book is an invitation — to see patriarchy clearly as a concrete system shaping every aspect of our lives, to examine your own complicity and commit to unlearning, to challenge patriarchy in your classroom and community, to connect this work to broader struggles for collective liberation, and to join the long tradition of educators who refused to reproduce oppression and chose instead to teach for freedom.

The work is hard. The work is necessary. The work is possible. And you don’t have to do it alone.

Welcome to the work. Welcome to the struggle. Let’s begin.

In solidarity and struggle,
Chris Noxz
December 10, 2025

Next chapter